The DA 2166 9 1 form is an NCO Evaluation Report used to assess the performance and potential of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. This form is designed to capture various administrative data, performance evaluations, and duty descriptions. It plays a crucial role in the evaluation process, helping to ensure that NCOs receive appropriate feedback and recognition for their contributions.
The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document in the U.S. Army, specifically designed for the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant. This form serves as a comprehensive tool for assessing an NCO's performance, potential, and professional development over a specified period. Key sections of the form include administrative data, which captures essential information such as the NCO's name, Social Security Number, rank, and the period covered by the evaluation. The authentication section requires signatures from the rater, senior rater, and, if applicable, a supplementary reviewer, ensuring that the evaluation process is transparent and accountable. Performance evaluation is a significant component, where the rater assesses the NCO on various attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievements. Each of these areas is rated based on established standards, providing a clear picture of the NCO's capabilities and areas for improvement. Additionally, the form allows for comments that can offer insights into the NCO's adherence to Army values and their overall contributions to the unit. Understanding this form is essential for both NCOs and their evaluators, as it plays a vital role in career progression and professional growth within the Army.
Where to Fax Form 433-d - The IRS offers guidance on filling out the form, but individual circumstances vary widely.
Completing the Georgia RV Bill of Sale form is vital for anyone looking to buy or sell a recreational vehicle, as it not only confirms the transaction but also includes necessary information about the RV itself. For more details on how to accurately document this process, visit Georgia PDF, where you can find helpful resources and guidance to ensure a seamless transfer of ownership.
Dd Form 2870 Release of Information - The DD 2870 is crucial for continuity of care among military health service providers.
Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward process, but many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to delays or complications. One frequent error is failing to include complete and accurate personal information in Part I. This includes the rated NCO's name, social security number, and rank. Omitting any of these details can result in processing issues or even rejection of the form.
Another common mistake involves the dates provided in the "Period Covered" section. It’s essential to ensure that the "From" and "Thru" dates accurately reflect the evaluation period. If these dates are incorrect or inconsistent, it may raise questions about the validity of the evaluation.
In Part II, authentication is critical. Many individuals neglect to have the rater and senior rater sign and date the form. A missing signature can lead to significant delays in processing the evaluation report. Additionally, the email addresses provided should be valid government or military addresses. Errors in these email addresses can hinder communication and follow-up.
When detailing the duty description in Part III, some evaluators fail to provide enough specific information about the rated NCO's responsibilities. Vague descriptions can lead to misunderstandings about the individual’s role and contributions. It is important to clearly outline daily duties, areas of special emphasis, and any appointed duties to give a complete picture of the NCO’s performance.
Part IV, which evaluates performance, is often filled out hastily. Evaluators should take care to provide thoughtful comments for each category, such as "Character" and "Presence." Generic comments do not adequately reflect the NCO's performance and can undermine the evaluation's credibility. Specific examples and observations can greatly enhance the quality of the evaluation.
Another mistake is neglecting to check the APFT (Army Physical Fitness Test) results. If the rated NCO has failed the APFT or is on profile, the evaluator must provide comments explaining the circumstances. This transparency is crucial for a fair assessment.
In addition, evaluators sometimes overlook the importance of the "Senior Rater Overall Potential" section. This part is crucial for comparing the rated NCO to peers. It is essential to select the most accurate option and provide insightful comments that reflect the NCO’s potential. A lack of detail here can lead to misunderstandings about the NCO's standing within their peer group.
Finally, failing to review the entire form before submission can lead to overlooked errors. A thorough review can catch mistakes such as typos, missing signatures, or incomplete sections. Taking the time to double-check all entries ensures that the form is accurate and complete, facilitating a smoother evaluation process.
When filling out the DA 2166 9 1 form, there are several important considerations to keep in mind. Below is a list of things you should and shouldn't do to ensure accuracy and compliance.
Understanding the DA 2166 9 1 form is essential for effective evaluation within the military. However, several misconceptions can lead to confusion. Here are five common misunderstandings:
Clarifying these misconceptions can help individuals navigate the evaluation process more effectively, fostering a culture of growth and accountability.